Homepage > Fill in a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template
Table of Contents

The DA Form 2166-9-1, commonly known as the NCO Evaluation Report for Sergeants, plays a crucial role in the assessment and documentation of a Non-Commissioned Officer's performance and potential within the U.S. Army. This form is utilized to provide a comprehensive evaluation of an NCO’s abilities, including their leadership, professionalism, and overall contributions to their unit. The report is structured into several key parts, starting with administrative data that captures essential information such as the NCO's name, rank, and unit. Following this, the evaluation includes sections for authentication by the rater and senior rater, ensuring that the assessments are verified by appropriate supervisory personnel. The form emphasizes the importance of duty descriptions and performance evaluations, covering areas such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each category allows for detailed comments, which provide context and insight into the NCO’s performance. Additionally, the form requires the rated NCO to acknowledge their understanding of the evaluation process and the appeal rights available to them. Ultimately, the DA Form 2166-9-1 is not just a bureaucratic requirement; it is a vital tool for fostering growth and accountability within the Army's ranks, ensuring that each NCO is recognized for their contributions and guided toward their professional development.

Documents used along the form

The DA 2166-9-1 form is used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Along with this form, several other documents may be required or useful in the evaluation process. Below is a list of these documents, along with brief descriptions of each.

  • DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is used for evaluating staff sergeants. It provides a framework similar to the DA 2166-9-1 but is tailored for the specific responsibilities and expectations of that rank.
  • DA Form 1059: This document serves as a service school academic evaluation report. It captures the performance of soldiers during their attendance at military schools and training programs.
  • Hold Harmless Agreement: This essential document, like the California PDF Forms, plays a crucial role in protecting parties from liability during activities or events, ensuring clarity and safety are prioritized.
  • DA Form 4856: This is the development counseling form. It is used to document counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers, focusing on performance, potential, and areas for improvement.
  • DA Form 7500: This form is the Army's individual development plan. It outlines a soldier's career goals and the steps needed to achieve them, including training and education opportunities.
  • DA Form 670-1: This is the wear and appearance of Army uniforms form. It provides guidelines for proper uniform wear, which can reflect on an NCO's professionalism.
  • APFT Scorecard: The Army Physical Fitness Test scorecard records a soldier's physical fitness results. It is important for evaluating an NCO's physical readiness and overall health.
  • DA Form 2-1: This is the personnel qualification record. It includes a soldier's career data, assignments, training, and qualifications, providing a comprehensive view of their service history.
  • DA Form 4187: This is the personnel action request form. It is used to initiate various personnel actions, such as awards, transfers, or promotions, which can impact an NCO's evaluation.

These documents work together to provide a complete picture of an NCO's performance and potential. It is important to ensure that all relevant forms are completed accurately and submitted on time to support the evaluation process.

Da 2166 9 1 Example

HQDA#:

Attachments Menu

NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)

For use of this form, see AR 623-­3 and DA PAM 623-­3 the proponent agency is DCS, G-­1.

SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT

IN AR 623-­3

PART I ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

c. RANK

d. DATE OF RANK

e. PMOSC

f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND

g. STATUS CODE

h. UIC

i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION

j. PERIOD COVERED

FROMTHRU

YEAR MONTH DAY

YEAR MONTH DAY

k.RATED MONTHS

l.NONRATED CODES

m. NO OF ENCLOSURES

n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

PART II AUTHENTICATION

a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE

a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

a5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)

b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)

b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE

b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

b5. RANK

PMOSC/BRANCH

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)

c1. SUPPLEMENTARY

c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER

c3. RANK

PMOSC/

ORGANIZATION

DUTY ASSIGNMENT

REVIEW REQUIRED?

(Last, First, Middle Initial)

 

 

BRANCH

 

 

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c4. COMMENTS

 

c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE

c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)

 

c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS

ENCLOSED?

 

 

 

 

 

 

(.gov or .mil)

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-­3.

d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL

LATER

LATER

LATER

d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE

d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)

PART III DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)

a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE

b. DUTY MOSC

c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)

d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS

e.APPOINTED DUTIES

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:

Date:

b. Height:

Weight:

Within Standard?

(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile

c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

COMMENTS:

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

Page 1 of 2

APD LC v1.00ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)

SSN (or DOD ID No.)

THRU DATE

 

 

 

PART IV PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)

d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional

COMMENTS:

bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

 

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS:

Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.)

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS:

influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by

example Communicates.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS:

workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps,

Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the

profession.)

 

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.)

COMMENTS:

MET

DID NOT MEET

STANDARD

STANDARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE

 

i. I currently rate

NCOs in this grade.

 

COMMENTS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART V SENIOR RATER OVERALL POTENTIAL

a. Select one box representing Rated

b. COMMENTS:

 

NCO’s potential compared to others in the

 

 

same grade whom you have rated in your

 

 

career. I currently senior rate

 

 

NCOs in this grade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOST QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIGHLY QUALIFIED

 

 

QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOT QUALIFIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment (3-­5 years).

 

Successive Assignment:

1)

 

 

2)

Broadening Assignment:

 

 

 

DA FORM 2166-­9-­1, NOV 2015

 

Page 2 of 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APD PE v1.00ES

FAQ

What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The DA 2166 9 1 form is used for the Non-Commissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for the rank of Sergeant (SGT). This form serves to assess the performance and potential of NCOs within the U.S. Army. It is a key document in the evaluation process, providing a structured way to capture an NCO's accomplishments, leadership qualities, and overall effectiveness in their role.

Who is required to complete the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The form must be completed by the rated NCO, the rater, and the senior rater. The rated NCO provides personal information and acknowledges the evaluation. The rater assesses the NCO’s performance and potential, while the senior rater provides an overall evaluation and potential assessment. Each party must sign and date the form to authenticate their contributions.

What information is included in the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The form includes several sections that capture important details:

  1. Administrative Data: This section requires the rated NCO’s name, Social Security Number (SSN), rank, and unit information.
  2. Authentication: Rater and senior rater details, including signatures and email addresses, are documented here.
  3. Duty Description: The rater describes the NCO's principal duties and responsibilities.
  4. Performance Evaluation: This section assesses various competencies such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement.
  5. Senior Rater Overall Potential: The senior rater evaluates the NCO's potential compared to peers and lists assignments.

How does the evaluation process work with the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The evaluation process begins with the rater observing the NCO’s performance over a specified period. After the evaluation period, the rater completes the form, providing comments and ratings for various performance categories. The senior rater then reviews the evaluation, adding their assessment of the NCO's potential. The rated NCO must sign the form, acknowledging their awareness of the evaluation, even if they do not agree with it. This process ensures transparency and accountability in performance evaluations.

What should I do if I disagree with my evaluation on the DA 2166 9 1 form?

If you disagree with your evaluation, you have the right to appeal the assessment. The DA 2166 9 1 form includes a statement indicating that the rated NCO is aware of the appeals process outlined in Army Regulation 623-3. To initiate an appeal, follow the procedures detailed in the regulation, which typically involves submitting a written request for reconsideration to the appropriate authority within a specified timeframe.

Key takeaways

Understanding the DA 2166-9-1 form is essential for effective performance evaluation in the military. Here are key takeaways to consider when filling out and using this form:

  • Accurate Information is Crucial: Ensure that all administrative data, including names, ranks, and dates, are filled out accurately. Mistakes in this section can lead to complications in the evaluation process.
  • Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO must understand that their signature does not indicate agreement with the evaluation. Instead, it confirms that the administrative data and counseling dates are correct.
  • Performance Evaluation Sections: Pay close attention to the performance evaluation categories, such as character, presence, intellect, and leadership. Each area requires specific comments that reflect the NCO's performance.
  • Senior Rater’s Role: The senior rater provides an overall potential assessment. This evaluation is crucial for determining future assignments and career progression.
  • Follow the Appeals Process: Be aware of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. If there are disagreements with the evaluation, understanding the procedures for addressing these concerns is important.

Form Characteristics

Fact Name Description
Form Purpose The DA 2166-9-1 form is used for NCO Evaluation Reports for Sergeants.
Governing Regulations This form is governed by AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3.
Privacy Act Statement A Privacy Act Statement is included in AR 623-3, ensuring data protection.
Required Information Part I requires administrative data, including name, SSN, rank, and unit information.
Authentication Process Part II involves signatures from the rater, senior rater, and optional supplementary reviewer.
Counseling Dates Raters must document counseling dates in Part II, ensuring proper communication with the rated NCO.
Performance Evaluation Part IV assesses various competencies, including character, presence, intellect, and leadership.
Overall Potential Rating Part V allows the senior rater to evaluate the rated NCO's potential compared to peers.